To show up in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, your company needs to be easy to find, understand and trust. In practice: pages that answer real questions right at the start, content visible in the HTML, structured data, an identified author and sources, and mentions on other sites. This set of practices is known as GEO and AEO.

Search for "SEO for AI" and you'll find two names. AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) is optimization for answer engines: the goal is for your content to be the direct answer shown by Google, voice assistants and AI-generated summaries. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is optimization for generative engines such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude: the goal is for your brand to be cited or recommended when someone asks about your market.
Neither replaces traditional SEO. Assistants that search the web start from pages that are already well crawled, fast and relevant. GEO and AEO are an extra layer: writing and structuring the site so a machine can extract the right answer and attribute it to you.
These assistants answer in two ways. For general questions, they use what the language model learned in training. For questions that call for current or specific information, such as "which company automates customer service for clinics in my city", they run a live web search, read a few pages and build the answer, often with links to the sources.
In that second case, the assistant behaves like a reader in a hurry: it prefers pages that answer the question right at the start, in clear language, with verifiable information and signs that the source is trustworthy. A beautiful page that hides the answer in the middle of a long text or behind a click tends to be left out.
The term GEO comes from a 2023 academic study by researchers at Princeton and other institutions that tested what makes content appear more often in generative engine answers. Adding source citations, statistics and expert quotes increased visibility by up to 40%. Stuffing the text with keywords, the classic old-school SEO tactic, didn't help.
The actions below carry the most weight and work for both Google and AI assistants:
AI assistants cross-check sources. If your company only exists on its own site, it has less chance of being recommended than a brand cited in several trusted places.
Repeating keywords over and over, creating dozens of nearly identical pages or publishing generic mass-produced text doesn't increase your presence in AI answers, and it hurts traditional SEO too.
Be wary of anyone who promises to guarantee your company will appear in ChatGPT. Nobody controls the answers these systems give. What you can do is improve your odds, with better content that is easier to cite.
There is no official ChatGPT ranking dashboard. Measurement is done in three ways:
Start with the pages that already sell: services, products and the homepage. Adjust their direct answer, FAQs and structured data before producing new content. Then create articles that answer the questions customers ask before they buy.
If you want an assessment of how your brand shows up in these answers today and a plan of adjustments, that's one of the things our AI consulting for businesses covers.
The most common names are GEO (Generative Engine Optimization), for appearing in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, and AEO (Answer Engine Optimization), for being the direct answer in search engines and assistants. Both build on traditional SEO.
There is no way to buy a citation inside the answer. Even when platforms test ad formats, those appear separately and labeled. The answer itself comes from the content the system considers most useful and trustworthy.
It depends on how well the site is already crawled and on the competition for the topic. Adjustments to pages that already rank can show up within weeks; building authority on a new topic takes months. That's why measurement needs to be monthly.
Yes. Assistants that search the web start from well-crawled, relevant pages. GEO and AEO don't replace SEO: they add clarity and structure so the answer can be extracted and attributed to you.
It helps, but it isn't decisive. llms.txt is a proposed standard for summarizing a site for language models, not yet officially adopted by the major search engines. It's worth having, as long as the basics (clear, visible, structured content) are already in place.
Talk to the SINOON team and find out which agent, squad or engagement makes sense for where you are now.